
Homeopathy is a medical practice that seeks to treat
patients with diluted substances that are given orally. For those of you that
are not aware dilution means to make a solution thinner or weaker by adding
water. Homeopathy is founded upon two main philosophies. The first is that “like
heals like” and the second is “ultra-dilution”. “Like heals like” refers to the
belief that a substance that causes a symptom given in a diluted form will help
treat that same symptom. So if your rash is caused by poison ivy, if you give poison
ivy in a diluted form it will make the rash go away. “Ultra-dilution” states that the more diluted
a substance gets the more potent it becomes. This increased potency is aided by
a specific method of shaking the solution called “succession”. These practices are
what I will be referring to when I discuss homeopathy.
When you consider any medical practice it is good to
discuss if the ideas behind it are plausible. “Like heals like”, does not make
any sense when considering what we know today. If you are suffering from arsenic poisoning it
would not be logical to take more of it, even if it is in a diluted form. The
idea of “ultra-dilution” seems a little silly to me. Think of it this way, if I
have some chocolate syrup and a bag of milk, the way to make it chocolatier is
to add more syrup (making it more potent). However under the principle of “ultra-dilution”
my milk should get chocolatier with less syrup. That is not the case in the
real world. With all that being said, even if we don’t understand why it works,
it could still help. If you can show that it helps it doesn’t matter if you don’t
know how it works. This is the case with many anesthetics; we know that they do
reduce pain but we are not totally sure how they work. So now let’s discuss the
efficacy of homeopathy.
Similar to acupuncture there is a great deal of
conflicting evidence out there. In fact there are scientific journals out there
called homeopathy, in which the scientists are looking for evidence that
supports it. So this means once again we need to look critically at the literature.
We need to look at the experiments that have been done and determine if they
are done correctly. If you do this you will find that many of the studies in
support of homeopathy have major methodological flaws. This is why properly
conducted meta-analysis are so necessary. If properly done they can look at all
the studies out there and filter out the bad ones to determine what the truth
is. The UK Science and Technology committee did just that. They compiled a
report that looked at all the scientific evidence out there and came to the
conclusion that it simply does not work.
There is so much evidence out there showing that
homeopathy does not work and yet the industry continues to grow. In 2012 it was estimated that the homeopathy
industry in the US is worth 339.9 million dollars and that the annual growth is
7.2%. In 2006 it was estimated that 4.8 million people in the US used
homeopathy and that number is only expected to grow. This is sad, so many
people literally wasting their money on treatments that are totally ineffective.
Homeopathy does not work; it’s as simple as that.
References
1. House
of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy
2. Shang A, Huwiler-MÃ1⁄4ntener K, Nartey L,
JÃ1⁄4ni P, al e. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects?
comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. The Lancet. 2005;366(9487):726-32.
3. Ernst E. Homeopathy: What does the
"best" evidence tell us? Med J Aust. 2010;192(8):458-460.
No comments:
Post a Comment